Blog entry 3:
Water form
precipitation falls through the canopy on the ground. A certain amount of this
water doesn’t penetrate the canopy due to interception. The aim of the
following methods is to measure interception as simple as possible and as exact
as possible. The interception loss gets easily calculated by the difference
between the irrigated water and the water which falls on the ground. To measure
that, the water below the canopy needs to get collected by a vessel. Former
studies used plastic sheets (Shuttleworth
et al., 1984)
Plants at
the tree nursery Schinznach get irrigated by two different irrigation systems.
One is sprinkler irrigation and the other is a dripping system. Due to the fact
that water irrigated from a dripping system doesn’t touches leaves of the
plants and therefore doesn’t cause interception, it will not be taken into
account for the further studies.
There are two different methods to measure. The first one measures the interception per plant. The plant gets irrigated by a certain amount of water. The vessel collects the through-falling water. The difference of the amounts is the result. It is easily feasible to implement that in a potter. Another method is to irrigate two areas equally, one with plants the other without. Under the plants is one vessel and where no plants are is the second one. Then afterwards, the amount of water within the vessels gets compared. Due to the fact that the sprinkler system doesn't irrigates all plants in its environment equally, it is hardly possible to get to know the irrigated amount of water at a specific square meter. Therefore, the second method would be the better option to implement on the field.
The amount of the interception loss depends on the species, therefore, the measurements must be implemented at multiple species. However, it is not possible to do this with all different species from the tree nursery.
The only required material we need is vessels and plastic sheets. Water and irrigation devices are already at the tree nursery.
These methods don’t need a lot of time to implement. In one day should be feasible. Firstly, the plants get irrigated. After a while (depending on the weather), when the intercepted water is evaporated, the amount of water in the vessel can be measured. To measure the run off by Valerio, plants need to get irrigated of course. Meanwhile interception can be measured. Therefore, the measurements of interception depends on the run off measurement.
The amount of intercepted water depends strongly on the weather. The bigger the air moisture, the more time the water takes to evaporate. Therefore, it is very difficult to presume how long it takes.
There is not much additional information needed apart form information about the irrigation, such as length, amount and frequency.
The result of these measurement tells us how much water get lost by evaporation after irrigation or precipitation. It is a part of the whole evapotranspiration rate. This helps us to get to know more about the whole water cycle.
Bibliography
Shuttleworth,
W. J., Gash, J. H. C., Lloyd, C. R., Moore, C. J., Roberts, J., Filho, A. D. O.
M., … Carvalho De Moraes, J. (1984). Eddy correlation measurements of energy
partition for Amazonian forest. Quarterly Journal of the Royal
Meteorological Society, 110(466), 1143–1162. http://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711046622
Dear cherber,
AntwortenLöschenI like the simple way your experiment is set up.
In regards to your two measurment methods, I agree that the second one seems to be the better method. In my opinion also because one sprinkler possibly does not only water one single plant but also others surounding it, therefore possibly more water would be intercepted than in the experiment.
Furthermore it seems feasable to me, that a large enough spot without plants exists in field, therfore allowing the implementation of the second method.
Best regards
Matthias
Dear Christoph
AntwortenLöschenBjörn will create 4 plant classes which the RS-Team use to upscale the data from the WB-Team. For the RS-Team it would be nice if you could doing your experiment on all four plant classes.
If the weather play a dirty trick on our research, we should look forward if we could do your experiments in a greenhouse.
Greets Sebastian
Hi Christoph
AntwortenLöschenThank you for your precise measurement information.
Both methods have pros and cons, but method one is maybe more feasible and can be upscaled due to different plant classifications.
I think we should define a time range, in which we do our measurements, so we can put the results together and make the analysis for the same time.
Thanks for your good work!
Best regards
Eline